0
Welcome Guest! Login
0 items Join Now

SOLVED In responsive the second utility-a below the first?!

    • Paul's Avatar
    • Paul
    • Sr. Rocketeer
    • Posts: 100
    • Thanks: 0

    SOLVED In responsive the second utility-a below the first?!

    Posted 8 years 2 months ago
    • I use:
      utility-a, utility-b, utility-c, utility-d.
      utility-a, utility-b, utility-c, utility-d.

      When I check mobile I see the second utilitiy-a right below the first module in utility-a, but of course the module in utility-b should be below utility-a!

      So this is what I get in mobile:
      utility-a
      utility-a
      utility-b
      utility-b
      utility-c
      utility-c
      utility-d
      utility-d

      And this is how it should be:
      utility-a
      utility-b
      utility-c
      utility-d
      utility-a
      utility-b
      utility-c
      utility-d

      (I can’t just use other module positions like feature-a etc because I am going to use like 30 modules)

      Regards,
      Paul
    • MrT's Avatar
    • MrT
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 101084
    • Thanks: 13481
    • Web Designer/Developer

    Re: SOLVED In responsive the second utility-a below the first?!

    Posted 8 years 2 months ago
    • There's nothing you can do about that except to use another position below utility. Left to right will change to top to bottom on a mobile, so what it's doing is correct. Look at Gantry docs to see how to add a new position to the template.

      Regards, Mark.
    • Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
    • Paul's Avatar
    • Paul
    • Sr. Rocketeer
    • Posts: 100
    • Thanks: 0

    Re: SOLVED In responsive the second utility-a below the first?!

    Posted 8 years 1 month ago
    • Hi Mark,
      Thanks for your reply.
      I choose to add Module instances, in my case that was more user-friendly (than module positions).
      Regards,
      Paul

Time to create page: 0.048 seconds