Hi Derek,
Derek Rayburn wrote:
I hate to complain. I really do. I have loved RocketTheme for so long and have almost never posted or ask for anything until recently. I am not really sure if this is the right place to post this. It says General Discussion so, I went for it.
Yes, correct place to let off steam 
Derek Rayburn wrote:
I had originally posted a scathing "bye felicia" post but felt it was childish so I replaced with the sarcasm and went back to work.
We can appreciate sarcasm and irony but we prefer to keep members happy so that they don't have to resort to these tactics.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
I have never experienced a learning curve and Honestly, I get it. I don't particularly like the bloat that has happened to Joomla, RocketTheme and everything around us. Even Wordpress walks around snorting up processor and memory like it is CNN.com serving important fake news.
Yes, I understand that YAML, SCSS, LESS and all the other libraries help create a much more powerful system, exponentially so when compared to the size of the bloat. I realize it adds all this amazing function like overriding, updating, etc.
That is good to hear because first encounters with G5 for many members (myself included) was like root canal work without anaesthetic!
Derek Rayburn wrote:
What I don't understand is why in Gantry 4 it was so much easier to do things like, you know, Hyperlink. Seeing as the web is nothing but a gigantic collection of artsy hyperlinks, it would seem something has happened and it's mostly just artsy with very little links.
I guess in some ways the modules are more user friendly because they interact with the Joomla editors so links, styling etc. was so much easier. I don't think I have used the custom html particle as my clients would never be able to change anything without an editor.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
Now that we have particles, it seems that you have to go from this tab to that tab to this popup to that popup just to set a title, text and link and chances are the links are not going to look, feel or be anywhere near where you want them if there are linking functions at all. I feel like I am in a bad episode of "Dude where is my car", instead it's where is my hyperlinking capabilities. Then add in the fact that now that nice little standard layout that RocketTheme brought to Joomla is completely gone. A Template is no longer a collection of commonsense layouts and adjustment tools with really snazzy dependable modules but now it is a cluster of completely way too many layers of complexity in options for layouts and modules, particles, positions, assigned styles, etc. I can tell you there is no way these templates are that drastically differente from each other to justify the 10 different styles a template ships with and the corresponding layout adjustments.
The style presets are usually just a quick way to change colours and images. They work in exactly the same way as G4 templates. Often though, us poor web developers get clients who want things totally different and this is then when layouts and particles come into their own. I have had to set some particles straight into the layout because the client will screw them up if they go to change anything.
I have instances where clients want a particle but they need the image below the text and it has to be linked. With modules I was stuck with what I had unless I wanted to write the new php code for the module. Now I simply edit the twig file for the particle and the css for the particle and pace them in the custom folders.
I also still use modules in many cases because it is easier to get whatever effect or layout I want.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
Then what about how Modules can load Particles and Layouts can override Modules to load Particles, Great... I get it but why is that particles work differently depending on how you load them? Why is it Modules that used to work fine now have little issues here and there depending on where you load them. My guess, there was a variation, specific css or something missed in one of the many layered popups or tabs in the different styles withnin the RocketLauncher templates.
Your guess is probably right. But if we know about them we will fix them.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
Man. I get it. I really do. But wow! Seriously. My "custom.scss" is almost big enough to just toss in a bootstrap editor and a few php calls from one of the php frameworks and have an entirely new and easily unique site.
As I said earlier, sometimes it is easier to simply customise the particle css and bang it across to custom scss.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
So my issues may be that I looked at Sienna and tried to roll out a site with, then I tried to roll out a site with almost every other gantry 5 template. Yeah it worked. Kinda. All the fancy artsy stuff has very little function outside of EXACTLY as it shipped. I know it sounds nostalgic to yearn for those days of thirty clicks and your done but now I am hitting 30 clicks just to load 6 images into an imagegrid, and coding two pages of overrides after I spent 2 hours searching the forums to find the answer to how to change the imagegrid to have hyperlinks instead of lightbox. Amazing considering most of the posts I found ended with a moderator saying, "email me" or "post your private info" then the answer was never posted in that thread! So when I did find it, thinking surely it's something easy in all this overriding capabilities and preprocessors.... nope it would have been easier if I had just read the code and figured it out myself.
I sometimes get those frustrations too and I am a moderator! All of our moderators have access to the secure tab on posts so they should never ask for details to be emailed. There is an ex-moderator who still likes to help but as he doesn't have moderator rights he can only see public information, hence his request for emails, which should be disregarded for exactly the reasons you mention - no public answer for members to find.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
Used to be that every module, every thing, every layout presentation had the basic abilities to have links, be resized, be moved from one area of the layout or another. Yes, there would be the occassional "wow look at this" thing that was hard coded or specifically worked only because of some custom CSS specific to that position, to that module, to the layout, to that style. But wow, nothing works now without some form of custom.scss, almost nothing.
An element of that will be down to a combination of responsiveness, position flexibility, and provision for as much customisation as possible IF required.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
I know this sounds like a complaint, and it is, but I really want to know. I am the only one? Is this growing pains? Are future templates going to work out these issues before they are released? Do you guys even consider these issues?
We don't mind valid and justified complaints as they help us to grow and provide a better service to members. You are not the only one. There are others who just dont't get it at all (I was one until I had the Eureka moment), as well as those who do get it but feel overwhelmed by it, and there are those who get it, understand it, and flow with it to create their own particles.
When a template is released we sometimes have demo.css involved and in many cases this can be part of the problem that members have when their own content fails. The easiest solution was to have this css file and get members to delete it or unpublish it if they didn't need it. It still isn't perfect and I don't think there will ever be a 'perfect' solution but as we move forward we will find better ways to integrate and style particles. Just look at the way we have moved on with the introduction of inheritance in templates. We cannot do all of the thing we want to do immediately but we will look at the important stuff for prioritising work schedules.
Derek Rayburn wrote:
I just want to enjoy the system and manage some content. I can code but that was not supposed to be the point of all this, was it?
Hope you guys can overlook my aggravation and fill me in.
Thanks!
Derek
We all get aggravated and frustrated so our team is understanding about these things. There is nothing derogatory, malicious or vengeful in your post so we won't get upset at receiving your feedback. I hope I have answered some of the points you have made but I know that while we are continually striving to make things easier we do have to balance that with providing flexibility, and as a result things don't always get changed as quick as we would like.
The moderators are all happy to respond to posts for help as that is what we do. So if we can help you further with any specific change then please open a thread or give us a link to one that is unanswered and we will do our best to help.