0
Welcome Guest! Login
0 items Join Now

Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

  • Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • Sure do miss the old days when 30 clicks in a RocketTheme template created amazing web sites. It sure is fun to click on multiple floating windows and tabs to set simple options for a "particle". Feel like I am administrator of a windows server.
    • Last Edit: 8 years 6 months ago by Derek Rayburn.
    • Derek Rayburn,
      Just making a living doing what I love.
    • MrT's Avatar
    • MrT
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 101084
    • Thanks: 13484
    • Web Designer/Developer

    Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • I guess that's an ironic statement your making?

      Do you have a question that we can help you with?

      Regards, Mark.
    • Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
    • David Goode's Avatar
    • David Goode
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 17058
    • Thanks: 890
    • Web Designer and Host

    Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • Hi Derek,

      I remember the days when you got a RocketTheme template and had to edit index.php to select the dozen or so options available to change the template. Doesn't get much easier than that. Trouble is all of the sites looked the same bar colours and site content. There wasn't any real flexibility just more than the core Joomla offerings.

      Then we got Gantry 4 and that really paved the way to enable sites to look different. That too was a big learning curve at the time.

      Here we are with Gantry 5 and dozens of ways to do different things but without having overbloated pages of code, therefore better page loading times and bucketloads of flexibility.

      Not to forget that Joomla has advanced an awful lot in that time as well. Then add into the mix PHP 7.0 and sure it does feel like building websites is more complex.

      I think the toughest change is getting people to recognise if the website they are building will be requiring lots of changes and stacks of particles/modules or could you actually get away with building the site on Grav instead of Joomla or Wordpress.

      We can all yearn nostagically for the past but unless client and end-user web needs go full circle, then the days of 30 clicks and get paid for building a website are long gone.

    • Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information
  • Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • I hate to complain. I really do. I have loved RocketTheme for so long and have almost never posted or ask for anything until recently. I am not really sure if this is the right place to post this. It says General Discussion so, I went for it.

      I had originally posted a scathing "bye felicia" post but felt it was childish so I replaced with the sarcasm and went back to work.

      I have never experienced a learning curve and Honestly, I get it. I don't particularly like the bloat that has happened to Joomla, RocketTheme and everything around us. Even Wordpress walks around snorting up processor and memory like it is CNN.com serving important fake news.

      Yes, I understand that YAML, SCSS, LESS and all the other libraries help create a much more powerful system, exponentially so when compared to the size of the bloat. I realize it adds all this amazing function like overriding, updating, etc.

      What I don't understand is why in Gantry 4 it was so much easier to do things like, you know, Hyperlink. Seeing as the web is nothing but a gigantic collection of artsy hyperlinks, it would seem something has happened and it's mostly just artsy with very little links.

      Now that we have particles, it seems that you have to go from this tab to that tab to this popup to that popup just to set a title, text and link and chances are the links are not going to look, feel or be anywhere near where you want them if there are linking functions at all. I feel like I am in a bad episode of "Dude where is my car", instead it's where is my hyperlinking capabilities. Then add in the fact that now that nice little standard layout that RocketTheme brought to Joomla is completely gone. A Template is no longer a collection of commonsense layouts and adjustment tools with really snazzy dependable modules but now it is a cluster of completely way too many layers of complexity in options for layouts and modules, particles, positions, assigned styles, etc. I can tell you there is no way these templates are that drastically differente from each other to justify the 10 different styles a template ships with and the corresponding layout adjustments.

      Then what about how Modules can load Particles and Layouts can override Modules to load Particles, Great... I get it but why is that particles work differently depending on how you load them? Why is it Modules that used to work fine now have little issues here and there depending on where you load them. My guess, there was a variation, specific css or something missed in one of the many layered popups or tabs in the different styles withnin the RocketLauncher templates.

      Man. I get it. I really do. But wow! Seriously. My "custom.scss" is almost big enough to just toss in a bootstrap editor and a few php calls from one of the php frameworks and have an entirely new and easily unique site.

      So my issues may be that I looked at Sienna and tried to roll out a site with, then I tried to roll out a site with almost every other gantry 5 template. Yeah it worked. Kinda. All the fancy artsy stuff has very little function outside of EXACTLY as it shipped. I know it sounds nostalgic to yearn for those days of thirty clicks and your done but now I am hitting 30 clicks just to load 6 images into an imagegrid, and coding two pages of overrides after I spent 2 hours searching the forums to find the answer to how to change the imagegrid to have hyperlinks instead of lightbox. Amazing considering most of the posts I found ended with a moderator saying, "email me" or "post your private info" then the answer was never posted in that thread! So when I did find it, thinking surely it's something easy in all this overriding capabilities and preprocessors.... nope it would have been easier if I had just read the code and figured it out myself.

      Used to be that every module, every thing, every layout presentation had the basic abilities to have links, be resized, be moved from one area of the layout or another. Yes, there would be the occassional "wow look at this" thing that was hard coded or specifically worked only because of some custom CSS specific to that position, to that module, to the layout, to that style. But wow, nothing works now without some form of custom.scss, almost nothing.

      I know this sounds like a complaint, and it is, but I really want to know. I am the only one? Is this growing pains? Are future templates going to work out these issues before they are released? Do you guys even consider these issues?

      I just want to enjoy the system and manage some content. I can code but that was not supposed to be the point of all this, was it?

      Hope you guys can overlook my aggravation and fill me in.

      Thanks!
      Derek
    • Derek Rayburn,
      Just making a living doing what I love.
    • David Goode's Avatar
    • David Goode
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 17058
    • Thanks: 890
    • Web Designer and Host

    Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • Hi Derek,
      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      I hate to complain. I really do. I have loved RocketTheme for so long and have almost never posted or ask for anything until recently. I am not really sure if this is the right place to post this. It says General Discussion so, I went for it.

      Yes, correct place to let off steam ;)

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      I had originally posted a scathing "bye felicia" post but felt it was childish so I replaced with the sarcasm and went back to work.

      We can appreciate sarcasm and irony but we prefer to keep members happy so that they don't have to resort to these tactics.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      I have never experienced a learning curve and Honestly, I get it. I don't particularly like the bloat that has happened to Joomla, RocketTheme and everything around us. Even Wordpress walks around snorting up processor and memory like it is CNN.com serving important fake news.

      Yes, I understand that YAML, SCSS, LESS and all the other libraries help create a much more powerful system, exponentially so when compared to the size of the bloat. I realize it adds all this amazing function like overriding, updating, etc.

      That is good to hear because first encounters with G5 for many members (myself included) was like root canal work without anaesthetic!

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      What I don't understand is why in Gantry 4 it was so much easier to do things like, you know, Hyperlink. Seeing as the web is nothing but a gigantic collection of artsy hyperlinks, it would seem something has happened and it's mostly just artsy with very little links.

      I guess in some ways the modules are more user friendly because they interact with the Joomla editors so links, styling etc. was so much easier. I don't think I have used the custom html particle as my clients would never be able to change anything without an editor.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      Now that we have particles, it seems that you have to go from this tab to that tab to this popup to that popup just to set a title, text and link and chances are the links are not going to look, feel or be anywhere near where you want them if there are linking functions at all. I feel like I am in a bad episode of "Dude where is my car", instead it's where is my hyperlinking capabilities. Then add in the fact that now that nice little standard layout that RocketTheme brought to Joomla is completely gone. A Template is no longer a collection of commonsense layouts and adjustment tools with really snazzy dependable modules but now it is a cluster of completely way too many layers of complexity in options for layouts and modules, particles, positions, assigned styles, etc. I can tell you there is no way these templates are that drastically differente from each other to justify the 10 different styles a template ships with and the corresponding layout adjustments.

      The style presets are usually just a quick way to change colours and images. They work in exactly the same way as G4 templates. Often though, us poor web developers get clients who want things totally different and this is then when layouts and particles come into their own. I have had to set some particles straight into the layout because the client will screw them up if they go to change anything.

      I have instances where clients want a particle but they need the image below the text and it has to be linked. With modules I was stuck with what I had unless I wanted to write the new php code for the module. Now I simply edit the twig file for the particle and the css for the particle and pace them in the custom folders.

      I also still use modules in many cases because it is easier to get whatever effect or layout I want.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      Then what about how Modules can load Particles and Layouts can override Modules to load Particles, Great... I get it but why is that particles work differently depending on how you load them? Why is it Modules that used to work fine now have little issues here and there depending on where you load them. My guess, there was a variation, specific css or something missed in one of the many layered popups or tabs in the different styles withnin the RocketLauncher templates.

      Your guess is probably right. But if we know about them we will fix them.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      Man. I get it. I really do. But wow! Seriously. My "custom.scss" is almost big enough to just toss in a bootstrap editor and a few php calls from one of the php frameworks and have an entirely new and easily unique site.

      As I said earlier, sometimes it is easier to simply customise the particle css and bang it across to custom scss.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      So my issues may be that I looked at Sienna and tried to roll out a site with, then I tried to roll out a site with almost every other gantry 5 template. Yeah it worked. Kinda. All the fancy artsy stuff has very little function outside of EXACTLY as it shipped. I know it sounds nostalgic to yearn for those days of thirty clicks and your done but now I am hitting 30 clicks just to load 6 images into an imagegrid, and coding two pages of overrides after I spent 2 hours searching the forums to find the answer to how to change the imagegrid to have hyperlinks instead of lightbox. Amazing considering most of the posts I found ended with a moderator saying, "email me" or "post your private info" then the answer was never posted in that thread! So when I did find it, thinking surely it's something easy in all this overriding capabilities and preprocessors.... nope it would have been easier if I had just read the code and figured it out myself.

      I sometimes get those frustrations too and I am a moderator! All of our moderators have access to the secure tab on posts so they should never ask for details to be emailed. There is an ex-moderator who still likes to help but as he doesn't have moderator rights he can only see public information, hence his request for emails, which should be disregarded for exactly the reasons you mention - no public answer for members to find.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      Used to be that every module, every thing, every layout presentation had the basic abilities to have links, be resized, be moved from one area of the layout or another. Yes, there would be the occassional "wow look at this" thing that was hard coded or specifically worked only because of some custom CSS specific to that position, to that module, to the layout, to that style. But wow, nothing works now without some form of custom.scss, almost nothing.

      An element of that will be down to a combination of responsiveness, position flexibility, and provision for as much customisation as possible IF required.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      I know this sounds like a complaint, and it is, but I really want to know. I am the only one? Is this growing pains? Are future templates going to work out these issues before they are released? Do you guys even consider these issues?

      We don't mind valid and justified complaints as they help us to grow and provide a better service to members. You are not the only one. There are others who just dont't get it at all (I was one until I had the Eureka moment), as well as those who do get it but feel overwhelmed by it, and there are those who get it, understand it, and flow with it to create their own particles.

      When a template is released we sometimes have demo.css involved and in many cases this can be part of the problem that members have when their own content fails. The easiest solution was to have this css file and get members to delete it or unpublish it if they didn't need it. It still isn't perfect and I don't think there will ever be a 'perfect' solution but as we move forward we will find better ways to integrate and style particles. Just look at the way we have moved on with the introduction of inheritance in templates. We cannot do all of the thing we want to do immediately but we will look at the important stuff for prioritising work schedules.

      Derek Rayburn wrote:
      I just want to enjoy the system and manage some content. I can code but that was not supposed to be the point of all this, was it?

      Hope you guys can overlook my aggravation and fill me in.

      Thanks!
      Derek

      We all get aggravated and frustrated so our team is understanding about these things. There is nothing derogatory, malicious or vengeful in your post so we won't get upset at receiving your feedback. I hope I have answered some of the points you have made but I know that while we are continually striving to make things easier we do have to balance that with providing flexibility, and as a result things don't always get changed as quick as we would like.

      The moderators are all happy to respond to posts for help as that is what we do. So if we can help you further with any specific change then please open a thread or give us a link to one that is unanswered and we will do our best to help. :)

    • Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information
    • MrT's Avatar
    • MrT
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 101084
    • Thanks: 13484
    • Web Designer/Developer

    Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • I can't really add much more to @David's reply other than to say that we do listen and we are very grateful for the feedback. We have now has over 1,400 suggestions/issues raised in the public Gantry project on github and there are only 140 still open https://github.com/gantry/gantry5/issues . We've incorporated many member suggestions and even code written by the community to improve Gantry 5. Since we released Gantry 5 we have issued a considerable amount of updates too (every 2-3 weeks) https://github.com/gantry/gantry5/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.md . So, we do listen and we do act upon the feedback from the community.

      If you do have any specific questions that you need help with then please raise a separate post for each and we will be very happy to assist you.

      Thanks again.

      Regards, Mark.
    • Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
  • Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • Thanks David. Thanks to Mr.T too. You guys as well as so many others have been more helpful than I could ever tell you. For so many years I have just chugged away silently in the background and you guys have answered so many posts that have helped me.

      I really have given Gantry 5 about 6 to 9 months of attempts. Maybe it's because I have attempted to use it on production sites with pressure on me. I have also been trying hard to follow the methodologies and make changes that will be safe from updates and template changes.

      Honestly, I never thought about just changing the CSS for the particle directly and then breaking it out into the custom.scss. Commonsense you would think but sometimes those things just fly right over our head while we are in the middle of solving X for Y.

      I think what I will do is set Gantry 5 aside and work on it in a sandbox for a while. I have two more sites that have already been started in Gantry 5 and one of them I have restarted three times in Gantry and just yesterday, I restarted for a fourth time in a Gantry 4 Template and honestly, I am almost finished with the layout throughout the site and the content has even been sql imported throughout. I have not been able to get this far with Gantry 5 in less than two weeks of time.

      I still think it is more a problem of "I can only click and let my browser load between screens so many times in a day" and Gantry 5 has great features and yes I really do like almost all of them (still a little aggravated that basic hyperlinking is not available in EVERY particle). I swear, I laughed at one point because I had three computers going with twelve browser tabs across them (four on each) clicking as fast as I could on all of them and wow, I was running on ice. No progress.

      Maybe it is how I am wired. I can code but when I code, I have to code. I can create works of art but when I am working on art, I have to work on art. It seems I could go through the old Gantry 4 templates and just load all the graphics I wanted throughout the site, move some things left or right, adjust the postitions in the layouts and then once I was 80% to 90% done with the artistic vision I was seeing, I could start working on the css and overrides to get it just where I want it. I spent two weeks in frustration just with Protean becaues everythign I touched chagned the entire site so dramatically that I couldn't keep any artistic vision.

      I will do the "duh" thing and look into changing the css for the particles direct and then moving them over to custom.scss before wrapping up. I will also start looking into utilizing twig a little more as that is a great point too.

      I really wish I could put in a request for all particles to have some very simple basic functionality....

      Would be amazing if the particles could not be so many screens. I am a linux guy and I can not stand windows simply because you have to click 400 times into 40 different windows to do something you can do in linux with two or three command lines. Again though I would not expect the system to be rewritten for me. But surely there has to be some comprimise as I am sure it is the depth of the settings that is making it so time consuming and not so much the amazing amount of features we now have at our finger tips.

      For example, it seems that Particles are doing nothing more than the Joomla Category/Article system (with a nice sub system of layout control with all the MVC/overriding stuff too), but they are missing a major piece of the simplicity that Joomla has.... "Save & New" carrying over the category you were in. In the Particles, you can't just Save an Item and create a new one... you have to save it, go back to the particle, create a new one, then edit the new item. And in most of my experience so far, the titles, text and links from each of the particles is completely different depending on the the function of the particle. Then there are all those notable differences of when this particle is used as a slideshow, this doesn't work but when used as a testimonial this works. I have created cheatsheets for myself and I still seem to spend what feels like years clicking all over the place to get so little accomplished. I know it is funny but I am actually going through two AA batteries in my mouse per web site! Thank god I am not on metered internet! haha But returning to the point of "going back and forth" between the modules and the gantry system and then going back and forth between the particles and the particles items... it seems there is so much going back and forth just to set titles, text and links that it is so easy to misplace or forget that you had a variation set on this particle or a custom css id in this one.

      I am probably the last person that should be digging into this because UI is my thing. It drives me crazy that, for example, I have to explain the "alias" field to all my clients as I am training them to edit/add articles. I know there are solutions but my OCD kicks in.

      Anyway. I will do what I can to overcome these issues. I just really wish you guys could tug on the developers ears and find a way to create a happy medium in a future release. It is obviously an issue that has spread throughout the community. I just want to title, text and hyperlink in all those funky cool ways the modules always have and the particles looked like they would but sometimes maybe will or wont. uhhggggg.

      Thanks guys! Don't waste time responding to this one... you have people in the forums that really need your time. I will get over this.
    • The following users have thanked you: David Goode, MrT

    • Derek Rayburn,
      Just making a living doing what I love.
  • Re: Lovely Day In The Neighborhood.

    Posted 8 years 6 months ago
    • I guess I should stop being so silent and contribute my experience to the github. Yes, you guys do great and I can't ever thank you enough. I honestly would feel bad if I started raising every little issue in the forums. If you look at my long history of posts you will see the only one I posted I ended up answering myself. Usually, back in the day, if I ever reached out for support it was to pull a prank on someone and tell them something like, "hey, every time I turn on my ceiling fan my internet slows down." You guys are not only great at code/design/etc. but dealing with the public in these forums is beyond me! I mean I can deal with and enjoy working with the public but sometimes people either come off as ignorant and don't mean too due to cultural differences around the world or they are digging way to deep into a world they mistakenly found because the brand is so popular now. Kudos to you guys!!!
    • The following users have thanked you: David Goode, MrT, Matt

    • Derek Rayburn,
      Just making a living doing what I love.

Time to create page: 0.068 seconds