Henning wrote:
Over 45.000 members ... a good share of them have requests ...
Well, not all request can become reality. But believe me – the devs are looking into the requests forum.
The one thing I wanted to get out of joining this post's conversation is that things like Offline pages, custom 404 pages (which you told me to do myself in another post BTW), and extension/template functionality alterations (in the future) are things that Yootheme, Gavick, Bamboo, and others already do. The two things you have on all of the other providers out there is your immaculate taste for design and Gantry.
Why tell someone to do it themselves on a "feature request" forum, when RT could just as easily implement what the others are already doing by default and be all the more appealing to your customer-base?
I mean, I understand that about 40-60% of all the feature requests are bogus and petty, but there are a good portion of them that are strong, solid customer feedback that could benefit you in the long run. I still claim you guys are by far ahead of the other template providers, but when I offer good feedback about how you can be the ultimate all-in-one, premiere theme club, why should I be told to shut up or be derailed into a position that I shouldn't even have mentioned the issue in the first place?
RT has a horrible gap to close on updating past releases in a timely manner. The Maelstrom template was released in January....why is Crystal being updated now?