Hi Gene,
Gene Page wrote:
Whatever the motive or reason members are often (*by definition) ignored.
*ignore
verb (used with object), ig·nored, ig·nor·ing.
1. to refrain from noticing or recognizing
Synonyms - overlook, disregard, neglect
I'm not accusing anyone of malice. Given my brevity I can see how this post was taken in offense.
Not taken in offense but more about not wanting others to read their own meanings into your short post. Ignore implies intention as shown by the definition including the word refrain, which is a conscious act. :cheesy:
Gene Page wrote:
It's nothing personal against any Mod. I think you're all great people and I think you're all very capable.
I absolutely understand and completely sympathize with everything you've identified. Furthermore, I see for myself the workload and issues that everyone in the Mod Squad contends with on this forum. It is my belief that a large number of the threads on this board are initiated by inexperienced joomla users / web designers who perhaps may not fully comprehend the technical documentation.
This ties up resources. I've seen Mods custom code CSS. I've seen Mods answer Joomla core questions. I've seen Mods offer help with integrating brand new 3rd party extensions. Personally, I think all of this is truly great and well intended, but not at the expense of helping those with problems directly related to RT Products.
Regardless of circumstances the mod team try to help where we can. We also try to treat everyone with the same courtesy.
Gene Page wrote:
I've been with RT only a short time, and in that time it has become abundantly apparent that flaws do exist and persist in RT products. Some of these flaws are UI related, some are UX related, and some are just nasty bugs.
That sounds bad, but it is not surprising in the least. Flaws and bugs are to be expected from all template/extension developers on any tier. The difference one might expect is that those top tier developers offer greater support for their products.
As you say, these things are inevitable and we do try to get fixes out as soon as we can. However, this can be compounded by trying to replicate an issue that only appears on someone's local installation or a poor quality host where we don't get access. 
Gene Page wrote:
And yes, I have been made fully aware of the fact that RocketTheme makes virtually no guarantees or offer of support...
It's been posted so many times I'm beginning to think some of you are proud of the policy.
You're not are you? I mean, we're talking about it, I might as well ask... Are you proud of this language?
"RocketTheme offers these templates and designs "as is"..."
"...we offer no support via email or otherwise for installation, customization, administration, etc."
"RocketTheme does not commit to monitor these forums..."
If so, I recommend displaying it more prominently so potential customers are directly confronted by the callousness it conveys. I know I certainly overlooked most of that before shelling out 300 dollars.
Those are the terms and they are available via a link when signing up. This is the same as most online transactions in any sector of business. We recognise that they seem quite harsh but to soften them down would mean creating a document with so many exclusions that it would be seem like a typical insurance agreement. 
Gene Page wrote:
To be fair, I joined RocketTheme because RT is a big name, the templates are always astounding, and Gantry is the most clean, straight-forward and feature-rich framework I've seen. Sure it was a bit more expensive than the other template clubs I've been with ($44 and $74 dollars more to be exact), but I had hoped the benefits would be illuminated by the quality. Should the quality fail, I had hoped it would be supported in the most basic terms.
And most of the time that is what members get regardless of our TOS. 
Gene Page wrote:
On that note, let's review the original post in this thread. I searched for an issue I was experiencing with the thinking I may find an instant resolution (ie solved thread). Instead I found two people with the same problem who made a combined 4 posts over a span of nearly 3 weeks with no response from RocketTheme.
It was twenty-one days since FlahDesign first posted his issue with absolutely no response (again, People being ignored).
For the benefit of others who read this post I will reiterate the point that people who bump their own posts are effectively hiding their posts from us. We have over 45,000 members, and if you bear in mind the number of separate forum boards we have, then I think you can understand why we use the 'unanswered list' as a first response mechanism. 
Gene Page wrote:
That is not often the case, I know...
Sadly, however, in the three and a half months I've been here, I've learned a few things which relate to this...
1. People who post Extension Issues in General Discussion are more likely to get responses.
2. People who post Template Issues in General Discussion are more likely to get responses.
3. There's no way to follow bug cases, so posting over and over again is the only way to get information and/or resolution.
In other words, impolite and misdirected posting is more likely to lead to a response/resolution.
When taken into context with 4,000 plus posts we answer each month I have to say that you are incorrect. Impolite posts do get a reaction but not necessarily a solution, usually because the poster didn't supply sufficient information in the first place. If there is a simple solution to a problem then the mods will answer it, whichever forum it is in. Bear in mind we have seen most things more than once and it is as quick to answer a post and close it down as it is to argue the toss about something.
I view this post as informative for all parties, including existing and new members who can all learn something from it, including RT as member feedback is important.
Gene Page wrote:
I want to follow the rules. I want to be a part of this community. For $300 a year, I would like a more structured and responsive approach to support.
And just to be clear, as I conclude this unnecessarily lengthy response...
It's not the Mods. It's not the Developers. It's the system...
It might have worked 4 years ago, but I think it's time to re-evaluate how you deliver support or else every Mod post will include the Support TOS.
As a web developer myself I am still of the opinion that a good active community forum is still the right way to go. I use products where they rely on ticket systems and if I haven't had the problem before I cannot find an answer as I have no access to other peoples tickets. 
There are also many developers/clubs where they delete and bury posts they don't like. We try to avoid that because we want our members to see we are as transparent as we can be while still getting work done.
Our bug tracking is internal and as I mentioned previously, if we can replicate it we will fix it, if practical. The tracker includes the original forum post link and any updates to the ticket are automatically emailed to the mod, who will then respond on the forum post.
We aim to please as many members as possible but we all now that we will never please all of the members all of the time. :cheesy:
Thanks for your feedback.