Mission Control Bug - 2.5 Update
-
-
- Empowermom
- Hero Rocketeer
- Posts: 476
- Thanks: 32
- Andy "My Hero" Miller... thank you.
-
-
-
- Andy Miller
- Preeminent Rocketeer
- Posts: 9919
- Thanks: 96
- Web Kahuna
-
Ok guys, please try installing this plugin. Its should sort out the problems:
BROKEN LINK REMOVED
It basically patches the buggy joomla core template installer file, and also fixes the duplicate database entries. - Last Edit: 8 years 11 months ago by Kat05.
-
-
-
- Ben Sandberg
- Sr. Rocketeer
- Posts: 117
- Thanks: 3
-
-
-
- Andy Miller
- Preeminent Rocketeer
- Posts: 9919
- Thanks: 96
- Web Kahuna
-
-
-
- Ben Sandberg
- Sr. Rocketeer
- Posts: 117
- Thanks: 3
-
Yes; with a note;
Using J! 2.5.2, with MC 2.3 installed, I installed MC 2.4.
This created the duplicate records.
Installed the RokDuplTemplateFix plugin, fixed duplicate records.
Now, the footer claims 2.4 (perhaps most accurately) but the template (style) itself (and the Extension Update Manager) believe it's 2.3, notifying the user to upgrade.
My suspicion, without digging, is that the 2.4 db entries were deleted, leaving the now-outdated 2.3 data (in the #_extensions table)
But no matter what, this is great!
Thanks!
-
-
-
- Ben Sandberg
- Sr. Rocketeer
- Posts: 117
- Thanks: 3
-
(pssst, total non-sequitir)
Will you (Andy) be attending the Joomla World Conference ?
-
-
-
- Andy Miller
- Preeminent Rocketeer
- Posts: 9919
- Thanks: 96
- Web Kahuna
- Bah! I was planning on attending but that's when the US Grand Prix is scheduled in Austin. No way i'm going to miss the first F1 race on US soil for quite some years!
-
-
-
- Ben Sandberg
- Sr. Rocketeer
- Posts: 117
- Thanks: 3
-
drat. wanted to meet you. have fun in Texas.
-
-
-
- Andy Miller
- Preeminent Rocketeer
- Posts: 9919
- Thanks: 96
- Web Kahuna
-
PDXfixIT wrote:
Yes; with a note;
Using J! 2.5.2, with MC 2.3 installed, I installed MC 2.4.
This created the duplicate records.
Installed the RokDuplTemplateFix plugin, fixed duplicate records.
Now, the footer claims 2.4 (perhaps most accurately) but the template (style) itself (and the Extension Update Manager) believe it's 2.3, notifying the user to upgrade.
My suspicion, without digging, is that the 2.4 db entries were deleted, leaving the now-outdated 2.3 data (in the #_extensions table)
But no matter what, this is great!
Thanks!
btw, there's no version number stored in the #__extensions table, nor is there any direct association between the update system and the template system. I think the issue you are seeing is merely a result of the update status being cached for 24 hours.
-
Time to create page: 0.062 seconds