Andy Miller wrote:
Youyou, i strongly suggest using OS X as your base OS then running VMWare Fusion to run your other OS's.
As always, I must recognize that the Master Chief was right (as well as all the others which have kindly answered my post).
Virtualisation is very nice. One of my professor has explained to me how that works and it is really interessant ... I was not knowing some things of stuff was done. I have also makes some tests and I lost very few performance.
I have also realise that Vista is a total abberation !
ihadmeavision wrote:
If anyone is thinking of virtualization, and backup is important, you should consider not using bootcamp. Backing up a "pure" virtual image/machine is a piece of cake with something like Carbon Copy Cloner as it's just another file in OS X.
You're right.
Actually I have decided to use Wmware only (not Wmware on a bootcamp partition).
Finally ... I begin to have some difficulties to understand how MS can keep solding some OS because MacOSX as well as all UNIX based OS are so much performant.
An exemple ... open the Activity Monitor, open another window, shake it and observe the evolution of the Processor use:
- Under Leopard nothing disturb the processor
- Under XP, processors can reach 50% of activity (just for moving a window!)
- Under Vista, it is again more ... ???
Explication is that Windows has not still corrected a bad heritage that UNIX has corrected 8 years ago. On UNIX the graphisms are dedicated to the graphic card and there are very less routines invoqued.
Vista is a Joke I suppose ;D