0
Welcome Guest! Login
0 items Join Now

Which SMF Bridge Does Rocket Theme Use From JoomlaHacks

    • mas's Avatar
    • mas
    • Sr. Rocketeer
    • Posts: 104
    • Thanks: 0

    Re: Which SMF Bridge Does Rocket Theme Use From JoomlaHacks

    Posted 18 years 2 months ago
    • lol & I forgot to mention - the log in mod fort Orstio's bridge is horrible (by his own admission). Joomlahacks allows you to use any of the login modules + Arifin Liau modified one really nicely if you want a horizontal/flat login module too which you can find here...
    • Last Edit: 8 years 11 months ago by Kat05.
    • Joe Halleck's Avatar
    • Joe Halleck
    • Preeminent Rocketeer
    • Posts: 5480
    • Thanks: 67
    • Never give up!

    Re: Which SMF Bridge Does Rocket Theme Use From JoomlaHacks

    Posted 18 years 2 months ago
    • Looks like Bloc and Andy have something cooking on this. They are also working on solving the bridge issues with page header info from both SMF and Joomla. I am referring to the double head and body tag issue many get with the SMF and Jommla! bridges.


      At bottom of page:

      Joomla! Bridge Information
      This theme has been tested with the Simplemachines Joomla! Bridge 1.1.6 and the new Joomlahack’s 2.0 Beta bridge. This theme will NOT work with earlier versions. Both these new bridges use different techniques to put the needed code and css into the Joomla! template header, this is a new feature, and the V2 SMF theme is the first SMF theme we’ve created to support this.

      *NOTE: * Make sure you turn of “Compressed Output” in the SMF configuration or the theme will not function correctly.

      For further bridge configuration questions, please consult the RocketTheme SMF forums.
    • Last Edit: 8 years 11 months ago by Kat05.
    • Magento - phpBB3 - Kunena - RokBridge Specialist
      No Secure Tab posts unless requested.
      Use the Thank You and Life Preserver Buttons!
      Your signature is also great place for setup details...help us help you!

Time to create page: 0.052 seconds